We're walking home from school.
"I was thinking," Henry says. "I was thinking it would be good to have a little brother."
I can't help but picture it. Henry holding a little boy's hand, guiding him as he toddles down the sidewalk next to us. He would have been such an excellent big brother.
"Or a sister," he says. "Yeah, actually? I think I want a sister. Because I like the girls I'm related to. So I think if I had a sister, I would like that."
I am murmuring noncommittally. "Huh!"I say. "Hmm!"
"So," he adds, looking at me, "can I get one?"
"I don't think it's in the cards for us, sweetie," I finally say.
"What does that mean, in the cards?"
"It means I don't think it's going to happen."
"That's okay," he says quickly. "That's fine. I was just thinking. "
I try to point out the advantages of being an only child. The quality time with us. He does not appear convinced.
"It could be fun, though," he says.
"Yes," I agree. "It could be."
*
When we made the move back to the city from the suburbs, part of it was because we realized we weren't going to try again. There are so many reasons, and if I give them, I'm afraid someone's going to pop up in the comments to argue that our reasons aren't good enough. "Oh, you can still have a second even if X!" this imaginary person might say. "My precious miracle came about even though we also thought Y and Z and you might be the same way so keep on trying!"
No. It's not going to happen.
And I am sorry. I am. It's so much more satisfying for everyone else, to have a successful pregnancy after a miscarriage. It's expected. You keep on trying, and then eventually you get pregnant and it all works out and the miscarriage becomes an unfortunate blip in your otherwise upbeat narrative. I realize that this is kind of a bummer.
*
Henry hasn't asked about a sibling for a long, long while--long before I had the miscarriage. It's interesting that it's come up for him now, just as my essay appeared in The Sun and I've been sort of overwhelmed by the feelings stirred up by the publication and its response.
I have to admit, I feel a little strange about all these Sun readers emailing me, responding as if I still feel the pain of the miscarriage as acutely as I did back when the essay was written. I wrote it well over a year ago, and when I finished, I felt like I had exorcised something. I exorcised it and saved it in a Word file and then I was free. And now all these people are expressing their sympathy, when that pain has dulled to an occasional ache, and I feel like I'm pretending to be something I'm not. Like I need to tell them they've made a mistake.
Then as I'm responding to them, something bursts open. All that pain I thought I had purged, that deep, awful well. It's right there, and I want to scream. Then I want to thank all these people who wrote to me, because part of me was afraid it was gone. Nope, still there. I still miss that baby I thought I was going to have. That baby who would have been one year old just a couple of weeks ago.
So many people writing to me want me to know about the children they had after their miscarriages. The happy endings they wish for me. I know they're hoping to make me feel better, I get that, but all I can think is, there won't be a second for me. And then I think: because I'm too selfish.
I am ashamed. Because I've made a decision, and at the heart of it, I made it for me. Scott and I made it for us. And for Henry, but who can really say what's best for him, at this point? I'm afraid we're doing Henry a disservice. That we're leaving him alone as we get older and more helpless, that we're depriving him of a soulmate and ally, someone to build forts with or whatever else I imagine he'd do with a sibling when I'm really beating myself up over my decision.
I wonder if he'll forgive us. I wonder if he'll hate us for it. I wonder if he'll be glad.
Of course I know, rationally, that only children can be happy and successful. I know that Henry's happy and well-adjusted and loved beyond measure. I do.
But it keeps coming up. They think I'm selfish, I think, when other parents ask me if Henry is an "only." Stingy. Not willing to spread myself just a little too thin. I want to give them my reasons. My very good, well-considered reasons. But I'm afraid they'd argue that those reasons aren't enough.
Henry is not an only, I want to say. Henry is enough. Can't that be the question? "So, was Henry enough for you?" I could confirm that without a trace of shame.
Just look at him, I could say.
Look at my boy. Look at all that I have.





Alice. I get that. I get all of it. Every word. And what you just said is perfect. Thank you for your honesty. I wrote you a week ago, can't recall what I called myself, but I want to be anonymous, and I just said I would be waiting for your response. But, I think, just reading you as you are, your honesty, his words, is perfect. I don't need another response. Keeping it real is good enough for me. I wish I could meet you in person to take you for a drink, or just hug you and say I love you. Because I do.
Posted by: jts | December 05, 2009 at 05:32 PM
I get it. (Believe it or not, I get the "You're only going to have two kids? Don't you want your girl?" quite often.) And I do get that when I say to someone, "Is he your only?" that they're often offended, but that's not what I mean. I mean to be polite, to make sure you've had a chance to talk about everyone in your family before the conversation moves on. But I still see the [understandable] defiance flare up in people's eyes, and I wish society's overall attitude didn't make them feel that they have to defend their family.
Posted by: Aimee | December 05, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Henry is enough. That's all we need to know.
Posted by: mosprott | December 05, 2009 at 06:09 PM
Love this! We are the parents to an only. I always say it (a second child) just didn't work out that way for us. Wasn't that we didn't try wasn't that we did, just never happened. We like our life the way it is, so here we are! She's 18 and in college now.
Posted by: Becky | December 05, 2009 at 06:13 PM
Alice, this post is beautiful. Beautifully written, beautiful sentiment. Just beautiful.
Posted by: Fairlytypical.wordpress.com | December 05, 2009 at 06:14 PM
Beautifully written, and what a sweet photo. There will also be people who think it's selfish to have too many kids. I related to his asking though, because my son, who had brother, wants a baby...and he says "please, please, please" like it's a lego set and eventually I'll give in. Tough for me, as I'd love another.
Posted by: Nicole Pelton | December 05, 2009 at 06:19 PM
Thank you for your honesty and sincerity and for such a flawless piece of writing. And be assured that only toucan know what is right for you. And that selfishness simply doesn't enter into the equation.
Posted by: Big Dot | December 05, 2009 at 06:23 PM
I have lurked forever but never commented. I don't know why ... you write so beautifully and poignantly.
I am an only and can't imagine it any other way. An only doesn't miss having siblings -- you can't miss what you never had. As a child, as a teen, as an adult, it's been fine. More than fine, actually; to quote you, it's been "enough".
You've made the right decision for your family.
Posted by: Paula | December 05, 2009 at 06:23 PM
Are there any choices where someone won't say "that's selfish"? Because Aimee and Nicole are right - there's someone to say it if you've had two kids, too. Or three. Or more. Or none, like my husband and me.
I think people just want to feel a connection, and to feel that connection through having made extremely similar choices. And if they like you and relate to you, they can't understand how you made a different decision than they did, or they feel betrayed by discovering that you made different a decision. It's not judge-y, exactly, though I admit that people sometimes are that, too.
Anyway, I mostly wanted to say thanks for writing - your writing is a joy to read, even when it's sad.
Posted by: MK | December 05, 2009 at 06:52 PM
It's unfortunate but true that just because you want another baby doesn't make it possible. It's also an incredibly difficult decision fraught with what-ifs and potential regrets - and you are very strong to decide that Henry is enough.
Posted by: a | December 05, 2009 at 06:58 PM
How timely. I just wrote these words yesterday:
"I occasionally feel guilty that [my daughter] will not have a sibling given how much she wants one, and lightly and fleetingly grieve that she will be my only child.
But I'm also utterly content that my family is complete."
So thank you for sharing. So much.
Posted by: mosey along | December 05, 2009 at 06:58 PM
This is such a personal decision, and it's all yours. Thanks for sharing these feelings--it's hard to admit your own doubts. All you really need is to find your own peace. Great writing!
Posted by: Emma | December 05, 2009 at 06:59 PM
I think one of my BIGGEST peeves in life is when people take a stance on SOMEONE ELSE'S childbearing decisions. It is such a deeply personal thing for so many reasons.
I love that last bit about your amazing boy not being an "only" but being "enough". I had that same thought when we were struggling to have our second and I was starting to think it was not going to happen.
I hope that you do not spend too much of your precious time feeling ashamed or selfish. I find you to be quite the opposite because a selfish woman would not share such tender parts of herself with all of us. Thank you for that!
Posted by: Michelle | December 05, 2009 at 07:14 PM
I get this. Obviously our reasons are totally different, but I feel very unsure about the whole question of whether or not to have a 2nd baby. My daughter is just so... all-consuming. She sucks up all the air in the room. And I adore her, but I can't fathom how I'd manage with two. People do, of course, I just don't know how. And I don't know if it'll be too late by the time I decide I'm ready.
For what it's worth, I don't think you're selfish at all. You're doing what's best for you & your family, and anyone who judges you for that can go to hell.
Posted by: cindy w | December 05, 2009 at 07:16 PM
This is beautiful.
Posted by: Superjules | December 05, 2009 at 07:24 PM
I'm so glad you're still posting and writing. It makes me want to respond, so...
I'm almost there. In my life I have had 9 miscarriages, one perinatal loss (because, of all things, a cord accident), and I have one son. I'm almost 39. I'm tired. I would like another child, but I've decreed one more year and that's it.
Not all sibling relationships are great; your family is the configuration that it is. There is no ideal family, just your own.
Posted by: Shandra | December 05, 2009 at 07:35 PM
My son is an only. Do I wish it was different, that he had a sibling? Sometimes. But is he enough? Yes, definitely.
Posted by: Barb | December 05, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Read your Sun essay, flipped straight to it when I saw your name and loved it. Phenomenal writing and what struck me most was how unfinished the whole thing was, but then that is how life is really. We never conclude a chapter or get closure. It all stays with us in some way or another. The decision to do it or not do it and why, a million reasons either way, all correct, and the heartbreak of it will be with you always. And, you have shared this ugly/beautiful stuff in a very public way and that is, in my opinion, the exact opposite of selfish.
Posted by: Mental Momma | December 05, 2009 at 07:46 PM
My friend Joy Behar is an only and she had only one child. Not only did she never regret it (she got more love) her daughter doesn't regret it either. (she got more as well)
Joy turned out fine. I, on the other hand, have a sister. And often wish I had been an only!
Posted by: Suzy | December 05, 2009 at 07:58 PM
I'm an only and I need to emphasize what others have said. You are enough. Scott is enough. Henry is enough. Being an only isn't a bad thing, in fact it's often really, really good. Are there things that can be tough about it? Sure. But no more things than are tough for someone with any number of siblings. You made the right choice, no matter what your reasons, and it's certainly not selfish to have done so.
Posted by: Kizz | December 05, 2009 at 08:06 PM
I am not original, as I realize I'm about to say something everyone else has said, but this was a really beautiful post. Perfect.
Posted by: Alicia @bethsix | December 05, 2009 at 08:08 PM
Yes, look at all that you have. Happy endings aren't the same for everyone.
I'm an only child. I can remember being sort of surprised to hear my mother say once, "I always wanted three children..." when I was an adult. She had never given me the slightest inkling that more was what she may have wanted when I was growing up. "We got it right the first time," my dad would say when people asked if I was the only. There were moments during my childhood when I thought a sibling would be fun to have, but to be honest, I felt more deprived when I didn't get the Barbie Dream House.
Posted by: Leslie | December 05, 2009 at 08:28 PM
What an exquisite post. This is my first visit here and I feel like I've stumbled onto something beautiful and rare.
This passage is pure poetry: "Henry is not an only, I want to say. Henry is enough."
Posted by: Kristen | December 05, 2009 at 08:28 PM
I'm an only child myself and my mama had an abortion after I was born - after that, she wasn't up for another pregnancy.
Henry will be just fine. I would have liked to have a sibling when I was a kid, but I wonder if I would still have the super-close relationship I have with my mama if I had to share her with a sibling or two. There are definitely trade-offs, but what matters is that he's loved.
Posted by: Sonja | December 05, 2009 at 08:37 PM
This is such a beautiful piece of writing. Really amazing. Clearly this is the right decision for you and you have said it so well. Thank you!
Posted by: abbyglassenberg | December 05, 2009 at 08:43 PM
You don't have to have an excuse for anything you do, Alice. It's your life, and the decisions you make are thought out and are the best things for your family. I frequently look at families after I've delivered their second child, walking down the hall with the first, and I wonder "what was wrong with that one? Why wasn't he/she enough?" And, as a person with younger siblings, I wonder the same thing, even now, about myself. "Why wasn't I enough?" I think when Henry's older, he'll look back and be glad that he was enough. I don't think there's anything wrong with only having one child. I don't think you should feel pressured to try again. People that tell you their "happy ending" stories are behaving as if your loss should be able to be pushed aside, when you're not ready for that. I think you're brave for the decisions you've made and for everything that you've gone through. Much love.
Posted by: Susan | December 05, 2009 at 08:50 PM
Meh, wish I could share the lovely sentiments of all your other commenters, but I am a deeply cynical reader of infertility blogs for close to a decade now. And there's one thing that reading those blogs has you believe, is that as soon as a mother posts "That is it! We are done! Our family is complete, we are perfect just as we are!" they penning a pregnancy announcement a few months later. Tertia, Karen Ovary, the list goes on and on.
You at least made sure to take a pregnancy test before you put up this post, right?
Posted by: Nony Mouse | December 05, 2009 at 08:54 PM
Oh, Alice. It's such a personal decision. Henry is loved, and that is enough. That is more than enough.
Posted by: Anna Marie | December 05, 2009 at 08:57 PM
I have an only/enough child as well, and I'm hapy that he gets all my attention, and that we can live the life we do because we don't have to stretch our dollars a little thinner. He's my Only, but he's also Enough, and he's also my Everything. I think there are pros/cons to having more than one, but it's not as if we need to worry about populating the earth....there should never be pressure on anyone to have more than one. :)
I love love love that picture!
Posted by: kaylen | December 05, 2009 at 08:59 PM
The Boy is an only. He'll be an only because I nearly died in childbirth. The Man couldn't go through that again. (I had a lot of drugs, I'm not sure I understood it all at the time... or even now.) I am... well, I'm not sure I could do it again either. For that I feel I am selfish too.
And I worry that he won't be ok, that he'd be better off with a sibling... but I know that deep down there are as many screwed up kids who have siblings as who don't. Try not to worry about them... and forgive you.
Posted by: Nat | December 05, 2009 at 09:01 PM
It really does sound like you are very clear on what's right for your family. I have two and while I adore them both beyond my wildest dreams and all of that, it is so incredibly hard I can hardly stand it some days. For me this is the way it was meant to be but I look at several friends with only children and I feel a bit envious. And, of course, that makes me feel guilty. Peace to you as you work through all of the tough emotions again.
Posted by: mama without instructions | December 05, 2009 at 09:01 PM
The only downside I've found to having an only child is the automatic assumption that you'll be the homeroom mom because it's not like you have anything else to do. It really cuts into my days of lying on the couch and eating ice cream after I drop my daughter off at school.
On a serious note, this was so beautifully written. You expressed being a mother of an only child perfectly.
Posted by: Big Mama | December 05, 2009 at 09:08 PM
This is beautiful. Thank you.
We are trying to decide whether to have another - after just having gone through cancer and not sure how much more to put my body through. But my son is enough, more than enough, and I will make sure until my dying day that he knows that.
Posted by: Twice Five Miles | December 05, 2009 at 09:12 PM
And, Henry, he IS enough. I am glad that you came to a decision that was right for you, your husband and your child. That is all that really matters. And, yes, the grief is always there, under the surface. xoxo.
Posted by: Megsie | December 05, 2009 at 09:22 PM
We have made the same decision. One perfect baby, then 4 losses, and people still argue my reasons for saying "enough." I think maybe they don't know what else to say?
It is amazing how the hurt seems distant for a while and then bubbles right up to the top, without warning. We'll never stop missing our babies, but that doesn't mean we don't move forward and give our lives new hopes and dreams.
You and I have our beautiful, sweet boys - who would TOTALLY be the best big bros ever - and we give them love and life without regrets. They have to know that they truly are enough.
Posted by: vbd93 | December 05, 2009 at 09:31 PM
not to try to change your mind. i think you're decisions are you're decisions and i know PLENTY of happy "enough" children.
but i wanted to say that my grandmother was pregnant 11 times and only 6 of those pregnancies resulted in children. i never heard her speak of the miscarriages until my grandfather died -- when she told him those babies were waiting for him in heaven. i would say that anyone who thinks your miscarriage could become a blip is lying to themselves or really doesn't understand.
Posted by: Sparkle | December 05, 2009 at 09:33 PM
Thank you.
I have longed for a second child and can not explain why I am not happy with just my one. Tonight was a hard night for me, filled with disappointing thoughts of never getting a chance to provide my child with a sibling.
But after reading this wonderfully poetic piece, I am finally at peace. If you do not know that you make a difference know that you have tonight.
Posted by: Rose | December 05, 2009 at 09:34 PM
I am an only. My son is an only. There are generations of onlies in my family.
But recently my aunt made a comment to me -- whenever you see a family with one child, there is always a story. There aren't always stories for the families with more than one -- but one, one is a story.
I liked being a story. I like my son's story. But you are most correct, the question is "Is he enough?"
Recently, my answer to "Is he an only child?" is "Yes, we figured out what caused it."
Posted by: Patricia | December 05, 2009 at 09:44 PM
lovely piece. so well said.
people criticise families for their choices all the time. i am very careful what i say to others -even it's a simple inquiry- because of what i have been through, but most people are not. (not that they mean to hurt you.) for some reason being an only is seen as strange, but i know a few adult onlys and they are great people. knowing the kind of mother you are, i'm sure that henry knows that he is both only and enough.
Posted by: beyond | December 05, 2009 at 09:45 PM
I had multiple miscarriages two decades ago. I can remember after my 3rd, when I was ready to move on and adopt, my OB told me that lots of women have multiple miscarriages. Why, he knew one woman who had 12 and had a baby. I was horrified. This was a very personal, private decision, and to have a doctor treat something minimized was really awful.
Every woman knows what she can or can't endure, what she is willing to risk emotionally and physically. No one should push her to do more than that.
Posted by: Lisa V | December 05, 2009 at 09:59 PM
Oh, please let me tell you (again? I don't remember) how much I love, love, love, love, loved being an only. My home did not have as much stress as other people's houses. It was as great as every resentful sibling imagines it would be. My parents made it to every event. We took better vacations. We went out to dinner more often. When I grew up, it was a pretty seamless transition. And new people I meet always say, "Really? You're an only?" with the unspoken "So why aren't you selfish or maladjusted or any of the things my parents said I would be if we didn't have more kids?" (OK, that's probably not what they are really thinking. But there is that surprise.)
Did I dream of having a sibling? Sure. I dream of having a million dollars and a house in Hawaii now. Just alternate realities, wondering what life would be like.
You will have even more wonderful experiences, your tight family of three, and he will realize what he has when he grows up. Not only do I look at all you have, but I look at all he has too. And I rejoice for him.
Please don't think this is a dismissal of your lost child. I still grieve for you and for that baby too. But don't worry about giving him a sibling as part of your grief. There's no telling how that would or would not have worked out. Enjoy each other and your perfect triangle. It really is a magic number. Honest.
Hang in there. Thank you for your writing. It really does bring me joy.
Posted by: MemeGRL | December 05, 2009 at 10:16 PM
My son is an "only" but, like you, I prefer to think of him as "enough". He is plenty enough for me. Happy, well-adjusted and a good person. What more could you hope for?
Posted by: Elizabeth | December 05, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Before we moved and I had a "not trying, not preventing" pregnancy, we were considering letting our son stay an only child. Even though I saw advantages to giving him a sibling, there is also something pretty cool about giving all your love to one kid as far as I'm concerned. I don't understand why people judge others for having one child. I know people who don't have siblings, and they are perfectly fine and happy. They have their parents, and have made their friends their honorary family, and I love it because I get to be so close to them and their kids. I think that Henry will be fine, you obviously love him to pieces. Things happen. Life is what it is. And I think that Henry will have a great one.
Posted by: Rachael | December 05, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Love, love, love this.
Posted by: kate | December 05, 2009 at 11:28 PM
Thank you for posting this....AND thank you to the people that responded that said they were either an only/enough, or have one. I only have one girl and feel kind of guilty that I am not giving her a gift of a sibling (not my words). It seems like everyone that I KNOW has more than one that I have been thinking I should create a club or play group for people with one child.
Anyway....I just wanted to say thanks for making me feel not so alone!
Posted by: Susie | December 05, 2009 at 11:39 PM
Alice,
Thanks, and yes, beautiful writing. I was the baby of 3 kids, I could have honestly done without the other 2. I know they felt the same. I envied the only children I knew. I have a son now, who feels like he is enough, if not too much sometimes. I can give him all that I have, which sometimes, is not enough. I can't imagine giving more. I decided to terminate a pregnancy this fall. And, I felt selfish and horrible, and I felt somehow responsible to all of the people with more to give than I who I could have adopted that baby. But, I had to do what I felt I should do. And, now I know, without a doubt. One. One is plenty, enough, and perfect for us. Recently, an older lady told me "One is a lot. Quit while you are ahead"
Posted by: janice | December 05, 2009 at 11:52 PM
I'm an only. My parents copped criticism for years - although it wasn't their choice, as dad was diagnosed with cancer when mum was 6 months pregnant with me. I was it, and they were grateful.
Henry won't know any different, and that's okay. I don't wish I had siblings. Growing up I was a little adult, so I'm told, and that's just me. I always preferred spending time with adults over other kids.
The advantage? I'm incredibly close to my parents. Very, very close, and it's something that many people, including my fiance, are very jealous of. They don't understand it.
Your choice is just that, YOUR choice. And I applaud you for sticking by it, and saying it how it is. And you definitely don't need to justify that decision to anyone else.
Thank you for posting this, it's beautful.
Posted by: Kelly | December 05, 2009 at 11:59 PM
You're worrying about a hypothesis with no possible control group, which means there's no real theory to prove here in the first place.
Whatever works best for you is what works best for Henry. He'll know it was the right thing. He's obviously already an amazing kid - how he could not?
Posted by: Amanda | December 06, 2009 at 12:10 AM
such a beautiful post.
i'm sure you and your husband have thought of this, but what about adoption?
Posted by: Anne | December 06, 2009 at 12:14 AM
You said it. Thanks for both the essay in The Sun and this post. You write beautifully, your humanity and humor are practically *tangible*, and you seem to be a wonderful mother: so glad to read you!
Posted by: CS | December 06, 2009 at 12:38 AM